Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Indicates that the report has been resolved through the implementation of a feature or the fixing of a bug.
10
votes
Should we change our name [Redux]
On why Moderators is bad, the main problem is that it does not accurately express the scope of the site and is not a broad enough topic by itself. There are areas of community building that involve t …
9
votes
community-building tag
I just went through and re-tagged any questions that only had the community-building tag on them. I propose we simply nuke the tag now.
5
votes
Inaccurate close reason
This appears to be a built in default that points at a topic setting that I can't seem to find but I agree this should be changed. I'll look in to it more.
9
votes
Should we change our name to make implicit that our scope goes beyond mere moderation?
I would suggest just "Community Building" to put more emphasis on the community building aspect. We really mostly want to be concerned about building communities and part of building communities is h …
13
votes
Changing the name of Moderators SE: the saga continues
I think community building works fine. I can't think of anything better.