This one has(had) a title that I found wasn't very good, it wasn't horrible either. This question also only had 1 tag. I added 3 tags including a new one which may or may not be a good tag owner when this edit is accepted these changes will have been made.
This question is very straight to the point, but I found that the title could be better
I changed it from
Helping dyslexic users participate in my community
Dyslexic user participation in the community
This question also lacked the participation tag that I think it needed.
It also doesn't show up right away when Google is given the keywords:
dyslexic community members participation
This question has a rather long title, longer than what will show on the google search, I think that this should be more precise.
I suggested instead of a title of:
How and when do I attract experts to a young site that doesn't yet have much expert content?
that it be changed to:
Attracting experts to a young site with little expert content
Much cleaner and more to the point, but still a long title that is still a little unclear.
Attracting Experts is a big deal and is kind of a broad topic, I suggested a new tag --> expert-users this tag shouldn't cover just attracting experts to the site, but also dealing with expert users, often times
know-it-alls can be a topic of discussion on meta sites.
I went searching for this question.
I typed in:
how do I participate as a new user
and another CB post appeared before this question
Encouraging new user participation while critiquing their first posts
(This may also need some editing) Also The Stack Overflow Privileges page of the Help Center showed up, and I still haven't seen this question, so I think that it could use a better title.
I changed it from:
Hi! I'm new and I want to participate…how do I do so?
How do I participate as a new user in a community?
in my edit suggestion.
I was thinking that the Tag rules-and-policies should be removed, but I don't know what other tags to tag this question with and I don't like just removing tags, but have suggested it anyway. I decided to suggest 2 more tags, user-retention and established-users they didn't have descriptions so I figured that they both need more definition, we will see what happens with those 2 tags.