Timeline for Should we encourage posters to at least state their background?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://moderators.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.moderators.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 30, 2014 at 16:44 | answer | added | AJ HendersonMod | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 3:21 | answer | added | Matt Giltaji | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 2:42 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | I agree that answers that assume certain site features, in the absence of them being stated in the question, pose a problem. I wonder whether we need to force specificity onto questions or generality onto answers (hence your question, I know). | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 2:36 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | @MonicaCellio: Yes, and I think that your question was a good one to ask and good to ask in that way. However, the slight mis-match between question and answer made me wonder if that might be problematic in the future. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 2:19 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | For what it's worth, I intentionally asked that question broadly, because I think of it as a behavior/policy question, not a technology question. While the problem I'm thinking of is on SE, I don't want this to be SE-only and that kind of problem exists elsewhere too. If folks think I should have asked it in an SE-specific way I'd like to hear that (maybe in a separate meta discussion). | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 1:43 | answer | added | user12 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 1:33 | history | asked | El'endia Starman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |