Timeline for Is our "apparent" scope too narrow? How do we grow this site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.moderators.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 16, 2015 at 1:31 | vote | accept | Monica Cellio | ||
| Oct 7, 2014 at 15:13 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Followup: meta.moderators.stackexchange.com/q/175/83 | |
| Oct 7, 2014 at 2:44 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Sounds good to me, and I think those three are the current contenders (with the third being controversial as it involves a narrowing, in one dimension, of claimed scope). | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 22:35 | comment | added | Andy Mod | @MonicaCellio, if there is another option that I missed, I think it can be posted here. When we vote all options can be presented then. Alternatively, I suppose we can start that topic now since we need to convince SE that our choice is more appropriate. I was trying to get all options on an equal footing though by presenting them all at one time. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:21 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | What would be the best venue for discussing these three name options? Just wait for the new meta post? ("We may be able to flesh out some details here first" suggests something else; what'd you have in mind?) | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 15:08 | history | answered | AndyMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |