Skip to main content
Community Building Meta

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.moderators.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I believe the distinction being made in this answerthis answer is too nuanced for this site; that's not how everybody actually uses those words and maintaining two tags with that distinction is not going to work out well. We should definitely not have two tags.

However, combining them into a single tag would be acceptable; anybody who starts typing either "rules" or "policies" will get there (no synonyms needed).

I believe the distinction being made in this answer is too nuanced for this site; that's not how everybody actually uses those words and maintaining two tags with that distinction is not going to work out well. We should definitely not have two tags.

However, combining them into a single tag would be acceptable; anybody who starts typing either "rules" or "policies" will get there (no synonyms needed).

I believe the distinction being made in this answer is too nuanced for this site; that's not how everybody actually uses those words and maintaining two tags with that distinction is not going to work out well. We should definitely not have two tags.

However, combining them into a single tag would be acceptable; anybody who starts typing either "rules" or "policies" will get there (no synonyms needed).

Source Link
Monica Cellio
Monica Cellio
  • 10.7k
  • 12
  • 22

I believe the distinction being made in this answer is too nuanced for this site; that's not how everybody actually uses those words and maintaining two tags with that distinction is not going to work out well. We should definitely not have two tags.

However, combining them into a single tag would be acceptable; anybody who starts typing either "rules" or "policies" will get there (no synonyms needed).