Timeline for How do we build the Community Building community?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018 at 15:44 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | @user2987828 I'm not going to dig through all that. :-) But if you do, look for a recent meta post -- probably the newest one on the site -- that explains the shutdown. | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 14:25 | comment | added | user2987828 | @MonicaCellio The link I just shared in my comment above specifies "You can download the data dump of all questions here". | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 12:53 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | @user2987828 as I recall (I saw the shutdown notice but of course it's gone now so I can't refresh my memory), they were down to one moderator and nobody else wanted to step up. (And I think that mod wanted to step down, but I might be mixing things up.) Communities do have to be able and willing to self-moderate. | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 8:02 | comment | added | user2987828 | @MonicaCellio : They said they wouldn't close an open beta, but they closed area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/4296/personal-productivity five days ago. What about that ? | |
| Mar 8, 2018 at 15:38 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | @user2987828 because they said they wouldn't. We're low-volume but we're maintaining it; we're not letting spam live and AFAIK flags are handled in an appropriate amount of time. | |
| Mar 8, 2018 at 15:33 | comment | added | user2987828 | @ani There has been one question in february 2018, out of topic: communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/2907/… ... why is the OP so sure that SE will not shut down this site for low activity? | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 23:38 | history | edited | Monica Cellio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 388 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 26, 2016 at 17:58 | comment | added | user1306322 | Right, so I guess only do that if you can come up with a reasonably relevant/interesting invitation. But you guys are the pros here, so I'll leave it to you. | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 16:54 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | @user1306322 Spam is not defined by the message selling something, but merely by it advertising something - and even in very loose definitions of advertising. If you do go to other communities to try and draw in users, the message needs to be both relevant and interesting to that particular community. | |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 15:27 | comment | added | user1306322 | Have you guys thought about emailing various communities? I'm not sure if that can be considered spam because you're not selling anything by that. Maybe some of the mail recipients would be interested in learning or contributing something. There are lots of bloggers who are pro PR and CM who post their ideas about things that would be on topic here. I don't know if that is the kind of content you would want though. | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 21:28 | answer | added | Zerotime | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 19:12 | answer | added | AndyMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 1:49 | history | asked | Monica Cellio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |