Skip to main content
replaced http://communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I just created for the two Streisand-effect questions (11, 22). I looked at our tags first and saw and . Neither has a wiki, and the questions on each seemed related but not quite the same.

What changes, if any, should we make to these three tags? It's possible that should be a synonym of , as the former nearly-inevitably leads to the latter. Having a synonym rather than just retagging would produce a match if somebody starts to type "negative", which seems helpful. But I don't know if that's true or valuable.

So, thoughts?

I just created for the two Streisand-effect questions (1, 2). I looked at our tags first and saw and . Neither has a wiki, and the questions on each seemed related but not quite the same.

What changes, if any, should we make to these three tags? It's possible that should be a synonym of , as the former nearly-inevitably leads to the latter. Having a synonym rather than just retagging would produce a match if somebody starts to type "negative", which seems helpful. But I don't know if that's true or valuable.

So, thoughts?

I just created for the two Streisand-effect questions (1, 2). I looked at our tags first and saw and . Neither has a wiki, and the questions on each seemed related but not quite the same.

What changes, if any, should we make to these three tags? It's possible that should be a synonym of , as the former nearly-inevitably leads to the latter. Having a synonym rather than just retagging would produce a match if somebody starts to type "negative", which seems helpful. But I don't know if that's true or valuable.

So, thoughts?

Source Link
Monica Cellio
  • 10.7k
  • 12
  • 22

Tags: negative-attention, backlash, and mistakes

I just created for the two Streisand-effect questions (1, 2). I looked at our tags first and saw and . Neither has a wiki, and the questions on each seemed related but not quite the same.

What changes, if any, should we make to these three tags? It's possible that should be a synonym of , as the former nearly-inevitably leads to the latter. Having a synonym rather than just retagging would produce a match if somebody starts to type "negative", which seems helpful. But I don't know if that's true or valuable.

So, thoughts?