Timeline for Shopping questions on Community Building?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://communitybuilding.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 12, 2015 at 16:40 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Since the question has been edited and re-opened, and its comments purged, the parts about the user's attitude are no longer relevant to the thread. Would be somewhat petty to leave them in, especially since the links are effectively broken.
|
| Mar 10, 2015 at 0:50 | comment | added | Air | Yes, as much as questions are in theory supposed to stand on their own, the self-answer does not help here. | |
| Mar 10, 2015 at 0:33 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Since "question" is flying around a lot in this post, best to quote them one by one. Also, make the "bad" question "badderer"
|
| Mar 10, 2015 at 0:05 | comment | added | Anonymous Penguin Mod | A few comments: 1.) the shopping thing: I think the OP was unfamiliar with the Stack Exchange-specific term 2.) For the intent thing, the self-answer was clearly stating the intent: a shopping questions. Like mentioned before, there's a better written, higher quality question nested inside the current one that needs to be brought out using an edit. | |
| Mar 9, 2015 at 23:14 | history | answered | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |