Skip to main content

Timeline for Let's talk about tag wikis

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 13, 2015 at 18:33 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 90 characters in body
Feb 10, 2015 at 23:54 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 45 characters in body
Feb 8, 2015 at 19:03 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 262 characters in body
Feb 8, 2015 at 18:54 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 36 characters in body
Feb 8, 2015 at 18:37 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 282 characters in body
Feb 8, 2015 at 5:49 comment added Anonymous Penguin Mod @Monica I thought of splitting them up into a ton of answers to vote on, but that probably would have cluttered the page too much. I can still do that, though. (also: Please note it is a community wiki for a reason)
Feb 8, 2015 at 2:42 comment added Monica Cellio The last cluster could all be collapsed into a single "moderators" tag, now that that's not the name of our site. Choosing them, training them, handling issues with them, how they work together... all one bucket with our current site scope.
Feb 8, 2015 at 2:41 comment added Monica Cellio If you're proposing merging bans and hellbans into disciplinary-actions, I agree.
Feb 8, 2015 at 2:40 comment added Monica Cellio On the user-behavior cluster, I think conflict-resolution is a separate thing. Note that bullying can be done by users and mods, and I'm pretty sure we've got a couple of questions about the latter, though perhaps a moderator-behavior tag (parallel with user-behavior) would be better. On the other hand, vague. Hmm.
Feb 8, 2015 at 2:38 comment added Monica Cellio I agree with merging reputation and karma into gamification, but I'm not sure about voting. Voting is gamification but it's also public ratings -- that is, votes (more than any other game elements) help the readers more than the posters. So we might want to keep that separate, at least for now.
Feb 8, 2015 at 0:00 comment added Monica Cellio I agree with some of these but not others, making voting hard. What's the best way to provide that kind of feedback?
Feb 7, 2015 at 16:30 comment added Anonymous Penguin Mod @AJHenderson RE: real-life vs. physical-communities: they seem like they would be used interchangeably, and we can't rely on tag wikis for people to always know the difference. Plus, what is the advantage of that one tag? I can only see a handful of events that would need that tag.
Feb 7, 2015 at 16:29 comment added Anonymous Penguin Mod @AJHenderson RE: start-up vs. small communities: I mostly agree, although I feel like start-up should be something more like new-communities.
Feb 7, 2015 at 15:07 comment added AJ Henderson Mod I'm not sure about real-life vs physical-communities. There is a difference between issues that occur as a result of real life issues or conflicts vs necessarily being a physical community.
Feb 7, 2015 at 15:06 comment added AJ Henderson Mod I'm not sure on start-up vs small communities. There is a difference between a currently small group that is designed to be larger and high growth vs a small community that is designed to start and stay small.
Feb 7, 2015 at 13:23 comment added Andy Mod Merging these, in combination with Monica's answer may take care of some of the "bad users" tags
Feb 7, 2015 at 6:20 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 53 characters in body
Feb 7, 2015 at 6:12 history edited Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 53 characters in body
S Feb 7, 2015 at 6:04 history answered Anonymous PenguinMod CC BY-SA 3.0
S Feb 7, 2015 at 6:04 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Anonymous PenguinMod